On 15/05/10 05:15, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Lane's message of vie may 14 13:26:06 -0400 2010:
>> However, I think -C is a special case because it's quite un-obvious
>> to the user that it effectively acts as a filter switch --- in fact a
>> de-filtering switch, because the lack of -C is what filters out the
>> DATABASE item.
>> I'm inclined to think that we should document that the output of -l
>> is restricted by -n and similar switches, but change the code so that
>> -C doesn't affect -l output. Comments?
Was this discussed change made? Was it backported, or only applied to head?
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Hartmut Goebel||Date: 2010-06-10 08:18:52|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5488: pg_dump does not quote column names -> pg_restore
may fail when upgrading|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2010-06-10 04:05:28|
|Subject: Re: BUG #5497: plpythonu gives cache lookup error |