Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: psql or pgbouncer bug?

From: Jakub Ouhrabka <kuba(at)comgate(dot)cz>
To: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: psql or pgbouncer bug?
Date: 2010-05-24 07:52:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
 > The auto-reconnect behavior is long-established and desirable.  What's
 > not desirable is continuing with any statements remaining on the same
 > line, I think.  We need to flush the input buffer on reconnect.

So if I understand it correctly, if I need correct transaction behaviour 
in psql even in case of disconnection the only safe way is to use one 
statement per line.

Is this correct?



In response to


pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Daniele VarrazzoDate: 2010-05-24 13:16:51
Subject: BUG #5469: regexp_matches() has poor behaviour and more poor documentation
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-05-24 03:24:07
Subject: Re: ERROR: failed to build any 3-way joins

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group