> *[Results]:* dump/restore (using 9.0beta1 dump against 8.4 database and
> restore to 9.0beta1) worked flawlessly, as does zabbix. Performance is
> comparable to 8.4 (no problems with the system inserting and deleting 50
> rows per second 24*7). Now running 10 days - originally installed on
> CentOS 5.4, meanwhile upgraded to CentOS 5.5, still works flawlessly.
Thanks for this, performance comparison is especially useful.
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
In response to
pgsql-testers by date
|Next:||From: Glen Barber||Date: 2010-06-07 15:26:40|
|Subject: Misplaced pg_upgrade_support.so ?|
|Previous:||From: Marcel Gsteiger||Date: 2010-05-21 20:01:35|
|Subject: [TEST REPORT]|