Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

From: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Erik Rijkers <er(at)xs4all(dot)nl>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Date: 2010-04-22 21:54:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Smith wrote:
> Erik Rijkers wrote:
>> This is the same behaviour (i.e. extreme slow standby) that I saw 
>> earlier (and which caused the
>> original post, btw).  In that earlier instance, the extreme slowness 
>> disappeared later, after many
>> hours maybe even days (without bouncing either primary or standby).
> Any possibility the standby is built with assertions turned out?  
> That's often the cause of this type of difference between pgbench 
> results on two systems, which easy to introduce when everyone is 
> building from source.  You should try this on both systems:
> psql -c "show debug_assertions"
Or even:

pg_config --configure

on both systems might be worth checking.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Erik RijkersDate: 2010-04-22 22:32:44
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2010-04-22 21:41:29
Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group