From: | "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov> |
---|---|
To: | "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
Date: | 2010-04-20 14:24:38 |
Message-ID: | 4BCD72D60200002500030BBA@gw.wicourts.gov |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>> Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>>> 3. Your proposal
>>> Treat superuser replication connection like non-superuser one
>
>> Well, only for this one very specific purpose. I would adjust
>> the docs like this:
>
>> Determines the number of connection "slots" that are reserved for
>> connections by PostgreSQL superusers. At most max_connections
>> connections can ever be active simultaneously. Whenever the
>> number of active concurrent connections is at least
>> max_connections minus superuser_reserved_connections, new
>> connections will be accepted only for superusers, and no new
>> replication connections will be accepted.
>
>> I think that's pretty simple and clear.
>
> +1. I'm not sure about the consequences of converting walsender
> to non-superuser across the board, and would prefer not to
> experiment with it at this stage of the release cycle.
+1
-Kevin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jim Nasby | 2010-04-20 23:34:00 | Inconsistency in docs for OVERLAPS |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-20 14:08:37 | Re: [HACKERS] Streaming replication document improvements |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Hiroshi Inoue | 2010-04-20 14:28:23 | Re: [GENERAL] trouble with to_char('L') |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2010-04-20 14:19:45 | Re: Thoughts on pg_hba.conf rejection |