From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pavelbaros <baros(dot)p(at)seznam(dot)cz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: GSoC - proposal - Materialized Views in PostgreSQL |
Date: | 2010-04-13 01:31:07 |
Message-ID: | 4BC3C95B.6050400@agliodbs.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> I don't want to see Materialized Views wander down the same path as
> partitioning, where lots of people produce "fun parts" patches, while
> ignoring the grunt work of things like production quality catalog
> support for the feature. I think Pavel's proposal got that part right
> by starting with the grammar and executor setup trivia. And Robert's
> comments about the details in that area it's easy to forget about hit
> the mark too.
Good point. And GSoC may be one of the few times we can get people to
do that kind of work. Other than Simon, of course. ;-)
I just worry about any feature which doesn't get as far as a
user-visible implementation. If someone doesn't do the rest of the
parts soon, such features tend to atrophy because nobody is using them.
--
-- Josh Berkus
PostgreSQL Experts Inc.
http://www.pgexperts.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2010-04-13 01:32:53 | Re: testing hot standby |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2010-04-13 01:28:51 | Naming of new EXCLUDE constraints |