Fujii Masao wrote:
> If adding new shared library is too big change at this point, I think
> that we should postpone the fix only for dblink to 9.1 or later. Since
> no one has complained about this long-term problem of dblink, I'm not
> sure it really should be fixed right now. Thought?
I would agree with this. No one has ever complained that I am aware of.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2010-04-12 14:27:03|
|Subject: Re: testing hot standby|
|Previous:||From: Erik Rijkers||Date: 2010-04-12 14:00:51|
|Subject: Re: testing HS/SR - 1 vs 2 performance|