Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Mark Kirkwood <mark(dot)kirkwood(at)catalyst(dot)net(dot)nz>
Cc: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, gokul007(at)gmail(dot)com
Subject: Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)
Date: 2010-02-27 21:15:43
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On 2/27/10 1:04 PM, Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> LOL - I said a bit - it was only a little, connected with the commit vs
> review confusion. I think I just got caught in the bedding in time for
> the new development processes, I was advised to add it to the
> commitfests, and them advised that it should not have been at a later time.

Yeah,this is only the 2nd year we have done CFs, and is the first year
we've had non-Core Team managing them.  So the cement on the procedure
is still wet.


In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2010-02-27 21:42:34
Subject: Re: trouble with to_char('L')
Previous:From: Michael MeskesDate: 2010-02-27 21:09:44
Subject: Re: ECPG, two varchars with same name on same line

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group