On 26/02/10 14:10, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> Ideally the standby would stash away the old pages or tuples somewhere
> so that it can still access them even after replaying the WAL records
> that remove them from the main storage. I realize that's not going to
> happen any time soon because it's hard to do, but that would really be
> the most robust fix possible.
Something like snapshotting a filesystem, so updates continue while
you're still looking at a static version.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2010-02-26 14:31:57|
|Subject: Re: Assertion failure in walreceiver|
|Previous:||From: Richard Huxton||Date: 2010-02-26 14:17:23|
|Subject: Re: Hot Standby query cancellation and Streaming Replication