Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: About psycopg2 (by its author)

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Federico Di Gregorio" <fog(at)initd(dot)org>
Cc: <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: About psycopg2 (by its author)
Date: 2010-02-09 15:32:26
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
[Resending; I accidentally failed to copy the list.]

Federico Di Gregorio <fog(at)initd(dot)org> wrote:
> the logical choice is plain LGPL3. I am open to motivated
> suggestions about other licenses but I'll ignore such crap as "BSD
> is more open than LGPL".
Well, I don't know about "more open", but I find the PostgreSQL BSD-
derived license easier to understand.
And I suspect that some of these requirements of LGPL might make it
unlikely to be considered as something that can be shipped with
PostgreSQL.  (Yeah, I'm looking at *you*, section 4.)
> DISCLAIMER. If I receive a message from you, you are agreeing
> that:
>  1. I am by definition, "the intended recipient".
>  2. All information in the email is mine to do with as I see fit
>  and make such financial profit, political mileage, or good joke
>  as it lends itself to. In particular, I may quote it on USENET or
>  the WWW.
>  3. I may take the contents as representing the views of your
>  company.
>  4. This overrides any disclaimer or statement of confidentiality
>  that may be included on your message.

Nice!  :-)

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Joachim WielandDate: 2010-02-09 15:33:23
Subject: Re: Pathological regexp match
Previous:From: Mark MielkeDate: 2010-02-09 14:53:17
Subject: Re: Avoiding bad prepared-statement plans.

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group