Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: mailing list archiver chewing patches

From: Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dfontaine(at)hi-media(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>, Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)toroid(dot)org>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: mailing list archiver chewing patches
Date: 2010-01-30 16:08:08
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-www
Il 19/01/2010 09:44, Magnus Hagander ha scritto:
> As long as the templating is separated from the code, it doesn't
> matter if it's a dedicated templating engine or PHP. The point being,
> focus on the contents and interface, porting the actual
> HTML-generation is likely to be easy compared to that.

I've been following the various suggestions. Please take a look at the 
updated archives proof of concept:

The PoC is now integrated with the website layout and has a working 
"Mailing lists" menu to navigate the available lists. The artificial 
monthly breakdown has been removed and both thread and date sorting use 
pagination instead.

The fancy tables are using the Ext JS framework as it was the only free 
one I could find that features column layout for trees. I'm not 
extremely happy about it, but it just works. Threads are loaded 
asynchronously (AJAX), while date sorting uses regular HTML tables with 
a bit of JS to get the fancy layout. This means that search engines 
still have a way to properly index all the messages.

Last but not least, it's backwards compatibile with the /message-id/* 
URI. The other one (/list/yyyy-mm/msg*.php) is implemented, but I just 
realized that it has problems dealing with the old archive weirdness 
(2009-12 shows also some messages dated aug 2009 nov 2009 or jan 2010 
for -hackers).

That said, there are still a few visual improvements to be done, but 
overall I'm pretty much satisfied.

Matteo Beccati

Development & Consulting -

In response to


pgsql-www by date

Next:From: Magnus HaganderDate: 2010-01-30 16:45:17
Subject: Re: Fwd: postgresql.ogg
Previous:From: Devrim GÜNDÜZDate: 2010-01-29 23:58:17
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Versions RSS page is missing version(s)

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-30 16:16:58
Subject: Re: PG 9.0 and standard_conforming_strings
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-30 16:06:02
Subject: Re: development setup and libdir

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group