Simon Riggs wrote:
> I'm a little worried the feature set of streaming rep isn't any better
> than what we have already.
Huh? Are you thinking of the "Record-based Log Shipping" described in
the manual, using a program to poll pg_xlogfile_name_offset() in a tight
loop, as a replacement for streaming replication? First of all, that
requires a big chunk of custom development, so it's a bit of a stretch
to say we have it already. Secondly, with that method, the standby still
still be replaying the WAL one file at a time, which makes a difference
with Hot Standby.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Greg Stark||Date: 2010-01-28 18:57:50|
|Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate|
|Previous:||From: Joshua D. Drake||Date: 2010-01-28 18:41:35|
|Subject: Re: Streaming replication, and walsender during recovery|