Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Robert Haas" <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Peter Eisentraut" <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: commit fests (was Re: primary key error message)
Date: 2010-01-21 23:48:40
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> If you want an example of something I *do* have a process problem
> with, it's Kevin Grittner's attempts
Hmmm....  Plural?  I've made exactly one post on the subject since
the CF started, unless you count review of Markus's dtester code,
which he posted before the CF but didn't add to the CF page.  Is
reviewing that a process violation?  Or was discussing it before the
CF the process issue?
After looking at my emails, I'm honestly confused.  If it was the
milestone patch, and your plural was a slip, I'll hold off on
further such posts.  If it's something else, I want to understand

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2010-01-21 23:52:54
Subject: Re: warn in plperl logs as... NOTICE??
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-01-21 23:36:31
Subject: Re: 8.5 vs. 9.0

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group