Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming replication status

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Greg Smith" <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Stefan Kaltenbrunner" <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>
Cc: "Simon Riggs" <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Josh Berkus" <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, "Heikki Linnakangas" <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, "Fujii Masao" <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status
Date: 2010-01-15 16:55:59
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> In many of the more secure environments I've worked in (finance, 
> defense), there is *no* access to the database server beyond what
> comes out of port 5432 without getting a whole separate team of
> people involved.  If the DBA can write a simple monitoring program
> themselves that presents data via the one port that is exposed,
> that makes life easier for them.
Right, we don't want to give the monitoring software an OS login for
the database servers, for security reasons.

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-15 17:00:32
Subject: Re: Streaming replication, loose ends
Previous:From: Greg SmithDate: 2010-01-15 16:50:39
Subject: Re: Streaming replication status

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group