Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server

From: Andy Colson <andy(at)squeakycode(dot)net>
To: Craig Ringer <craig(at)postnewspapers(dot)com(dot)au>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: a heavy duty operation on an "unused" table kills my server
Date: 2010-01-14 14:49:36
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
On 1/13/2010 11:36 PM, Craig Ringer wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> I'm kind of surprised that there are disk I/O subsystems that are so
>> bad that a single thread doing non-stop I/O can take down the whole
>> server.  Is that normal?
> No.
>> Does it happen on non-Windows operating
>> systems?
> Yes. My 3ware 8500-8 on a Debian Sarge box was so awful that launching a
> terminal would go from a 1/4 second operation to a 5 minute operation
> under heavy write load by one writer. I landed up having to modify the
> driver to partially mitigate the issue, but a single user on the
> terminal server performing any sort of heavy writing would still
> absolutely nuke performance.

On a side note, on linux, would using the deadline scheduler resolve that?


In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: tomDate: 2010-01-14 14:58:44
Subject: Slow "Select count(*) ..." query on table with 60 Mio. rows
Previous:From: Ivan VorasDate: 2010-01-14 14:49:16
Subject: Re: Inserting 8MB bytea: just 25% of disk perf used?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group