| From: | Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> |
|---|---|
| To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, jd <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL www <pgsql-www(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |
| Date: | 2009-12-30 12:50:08 |
| Message-ID: | 4B3B4C80.1000300@kaltenbrunner.cc |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-www |
Dave Page wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
> <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc> wrote:
>> well yeah but that might sum up to a dozends of people that will have to wit
>> for an updated spec file vs. we having to hack up fusionforge code and have
>> it maintained over years...
>
> The major issue with hacking up gforge in the past was that noone
> bothered to document what was changed, not that it was hacked in the
> first place.
while I agree that this should have been done in a dedicated repo/branch
in an SCM at least the changes done in the last few years (a handful of
security fixes) have been at least discussed on the gforge-admins list.
And as I said before our changes have been minor so that is not really
our issue.
Stefan
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dave Page | 2009-12-30 12:56:06 | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |
| Previous Message | Dave Page | 2009-12-30 12:38:05 | Re: pgFoundry Download URLs |