| From: | KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Takahiro Itagaki <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Largeobject Access Controls (r2460) |
| Date: | 2009-12-16 23:18:17 |
| Message-ID: | 4B296AB9.50004@ak.jp.nec.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
(2009/12/17 7:25), Robert Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 10:41 PM, Takahiro Itagaki
> <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>
>> KaiGai Kohei<kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com> wrote:
>>
>>> What's your opinion about:
>>> long desc: When turned on, privilege checks on large objects perform with
>>> backward compatibility as 8.4.x or earlier releases.
>>
>> I updated the description as your suggest.
>>
>> Applied with minor editorialization,
>> mainly around tab-completion support in psql.
>
> The documentation in this patch needs work.
Are you talking about English quality? or Am I missing something to be
documented?
--
OSS Platform Development Division, NEC
KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-12-16 23:26:40 | Re: determine snapshot after obtaining locks for first statement |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-12-16 23:13:06 | Re: determine snapshot after obtaining locks for first statement |