Re: one or 2 transactions?

From: "Jean-Yves F(dot) Barbier" <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "A(dot) Kretschmer" <andreas(dot)kretschmer(at)schollglas(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: one or 2 transactions?
Date: 2009-12-11 06:22:17
Message-ID: 4B21E519.8010705@gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-novice

A. Kretschmer a écrit :
...
>>> That's all a single transaction, including the DDL-statements (create table).
>> You mean I don't even need DEFERRABLE INITIALLY DEFERRED?
>
> In this case, yes.
>
>
>> If so, could you explain the purpose of these orders, PLS?
>
> To enable circular references like example below:
...
> HTH, Andreas

YES: now I understand very well the process, thanks Andreas!

--
Watch out for a cold wave this week. (Or maybe a warm WAC.)

In response to

Browse pgsql-novice by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Roach 2009-12-12 09:18:23 New installation "The Service Name is Invalid"
Previous Message A. Kretschmer 2009-12-11 06:10:09 Re: one or 2 transactions?