Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4?

From: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4?
Date: 2009-12-01 22:40:06
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
>> What I was trying to suggest was that right now, there are situations 
>> where a new deployment on 8.1 is still completely reasonable and 
>> possible to justify in the Enterprise Linux space, whereas I don't know 
>> of any situation where 7.4/8.0 can be similarly defended as a good 
>> idea.
> Okay, but how much of the argument for that hinges on it being the only
> thing Red Hat will support on RHEL5?
Sure, at some point in 2010, we may reach a point where it would be ill 
advised to build a new system using RHEL5/PG8.1.  I was suggesting more 
that there are completely reasonable reasons to deploy 8.1 even right 
now in 2009, and people are doing so.  That gives the release a lot more 
future than 7.4 and 8.0, which anyone sensible gave up on a while ago.  
I'm all for dropping those older ones, but I don't think getting more 
aggressive than that and bundling 8.1 in while you're at it is so wise.

Greg Smith    2ndQuadrant   Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Richard HuxtonDate: 2009-12-01 22:46:32
Subject: Re: Block-level CRC checks
Previous:From: Devrim GÜNDÜZDate: 2009-12-01 22:22:32
Subject: Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group