| From: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-core(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4? |
| Date: | 2009-12-01 22:05:25 |
| Message-ID: | 4B159325.6080609@2ndquadrant.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> Well, actually, if it's just "what will RH support", I just today got
> launch commit on this...
>
What I was trying to suggest was that right now, there are situations
where a new deployment on 8.1 is still completely reasonable and
possible to justify in the Enterprise Linux space, whereas I don't know
of any situation where 7.4/8.0 can be similarly defended as a good
idea. That makes supporting 8.1 quite a bit more valuable to the
community than the earlier releases IMHO.
Moving forward, I was hoping that we all get RHEL6 as a deployment
option in the not so distant future for a platform that integrates 8.4
from day one; I didn't think that deploying RHEL5 was going to be the
only choice for too much longer.
--
Greg Smith 2ndQuadrant Baltimore, MD
PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support
greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com www.2ndQuadrant.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2009-12-01 22:12:13 | Re: Block-level CRC checks |
| Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2009-12-01 22:04:52 | Re: [CORE] EOL for 7.4? |