Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: bytea and text

From: "Jean-Yves F(dot) Barbier" <12ukwn(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Didier Gasser-Morlay <didiergm(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-novice(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: bytea and text
Date: 2009-11-29 06:55:40
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-novice
Didier Gasser-Morlay a écrit :
> I hope you won't mind if I had my 2 cents to this conversation; aside
> from the actual format, this question comes up with regularity on
> various database lists.
> I have never understood the need for storing images inside a database
> (and to some extend blob data) because:
>   - being a blog you do not query it just store and retrieve, you rarely
> update, so the need for a fancy SQL and DB engine is somewhat limited;

this is not a blog, but pictures aren't updated
>   - storing images is heavy, makes the database grow, thus makes
> backup/restore that bit more painful and possibly that bit less stable. ..

> For years I designed system for picture libraries where numbers like 10s
> of thousands to millions of images are common place, we would never have
> contemplated to store images on anything more complex than a file
> system. using the database to store a URL to that resource.

hmmmm, just a one shot backup for "just users".

I'm not going to feed this troll, this is MY choice.

Being stoned on marijuana isn't very different from being stoned on gin.
		-- Ralph Nader

In response to

pgsql-novice by date

Next:From: Didier Gasser-MorlayDate: 2009-11-29 07:23:31
Subject: Re: bytea and text
Previous:From: Didier Gasser-MorlayDate: 2009-11-29 06:50:10
Subject: Re: bytea and text

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group