Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)


From: Brad Nicholson <bnichols(at)ca(dot)afilias(dot)info>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Karl Denninger <karl(at)denninger(dot)net>, Laszlo Nagy <gandalf(at)shopzeus(dot)com>, pgsql-performance <pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: SSD + RAID
Date: 2009-11-13 19:24:16
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-performance
Greg Smith wrote:
> Karl Denninger wrote:
>> With the write cache off on these disks they still are huge wins for
>> very-heavy-read applications, which many are.
> Very read-heavy applications would do better to buy a ton of RAM 
> instead and just make sure they populate from permanent media (say by 
> reading everything in early at sequential rates to prime the cache).  
> There is an extremely narrow use-case where SSDs are the right 
> technology, and it's only in a subset even of read-heavy apps where 
> they make sense.

Out of curiosity, what are those narrow use cases where you think SSD's 
are the correct technology?

Brad Nicholson  416-673-4106
Database Administrator, Afilias Canada Corp.

In response to


pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Dave CrookeDate: 2009-11-13 20:22:22
Subject: Re: SSD + RAID
Previous:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2009-11-13 18:57:28
Subject: Re: SSD + RAID

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group