> Let's see...if I remember correctly from the last two rounds of this
> discussion, this is the point where someone pops up and says that
> switching to XML for the postgresql.conf will solve this problem.
> Whoever does that this time goes into the ring with Kevin and I, but
> they don't get a club. (All fight proceeds to benefit SPI of course).
XML is soooo last-week. JSON!
Oh, wait, we're PostgreSQL, we're not that mainstream. YAML!
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2009-10-28 20:26:02|
|Subject: Re: inefficient use of relation extension?|
|Previous:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2009-10-28 20:11:44|
|Subject: Re: Parsing config files in a directory|