| From: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> | 
|---|---|
| To: | "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas? | 
| Date: | 2009-10-26 22:03:12 | 
| Message-ID: | 4AE61CA0.7010709@dunslane.net | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
David E. Wheeler wrote:
> On Oct 26, 2009, at 2:12 PM, Pavel Stehule wrote:
>
>> it should be light relation. 'DO' should be parametrised, and psql can
>> use own variables as 'DO' parameters.
>
> I see, because `DO` is a statement, not an expression. Thus arguments 
> don't really make much sense (I wish it was an expression!).
>
> I don't think it's a good idea to tie SQL syntax to a feature of a 
> client, though.
>
Me either.
I think we need to take this more slowly. Frankly, I think we have most 
of what we really wanted already, and I suspect anything else is 
probably not worth the code complexity involved. The original motivation 
as I understood it was to enable people to embed a piece of pl/foo in a 
script with minimal syntactic overhead, and I think that's been achieved.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2009-10-26 22:05:20 | Re: per-tablespace random_page_cost/seq_page_cost | 
| Previous Message | David E. Wheeler | 2009-10-26 21:57:56 | Re: Anonymous Code Blocks as Lambdas? |