| From: | Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> | 
| Cc: | pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org | 
| Subject: | Re: Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 | 
| Date: | 2009-10-26 17:09:32 | 
| Message-ID: | 4AE5D7CC.202@krogh.cc | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance | 
Tom Lane wrote:
> Jesper Krogh <jesper(at)krogh(dot)cc> writes:
>> Is is possible to manually set the cost for the @@ operator?
> 
> You want to set the cost for the underlying function.
alter function ts_match_vq(tsvector,tsquery) cost 500
seems to change my test-queries in a very positive way (e.g. resolve to
bitmap index scan on most queryies but fall onto index-scans on
alternative columns when queriterms are common enough).
According to the documentation the default cost is 1 for builin
functions and 100 for others, is this true for the ts-stuff also?
Can I query the database for the cost of the functions?
It somehow seems natural that comparing a 1,3 term tsquery to a 200+
term tsvector is orders of magitude more expensive than simple operations.
I somehow suspect that this is a bad thing to do if I have other
gin-indexes where the tsvector is much smaller in the same database. But
then I can just use ts_match_qv for those queries or add my own which
justy raises the cost.
Thanks.
-- 
Jesper
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-10-26 17:31:01 | Re: Full text search - query plan? PG 8.4.1 | 
| Previous Message | Michal J. Kubski | 2009-10-26 13:50:00 | Re: query planning different in plpgsql? |