Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: vacuumdb error

From: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
To: Thom Brown <thombrown(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: vacuumdb error
Date: 2009-10-16 10:39:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Thom Brown wrote:
> This is either a bug in vacuumdb with it not using the correct order,
> or postgres shouldn't be paying attention to the order of the
> keywords.  In any case, it doesn't work.  I've searched the postgres
> FAQs, TODO and mailing list archives, but can't find a mention of
> this.

Thanks, fixed. We had the same bug with FREEZE and ANALYZE combination,
which was fixed in April, but the order between FREEZE and VERBOSE was
still incorrect.

  Heikki Linnakangas

In response to


pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: Thom BrownDate: 2009-10-16 12:28:03
Subject: Re: vacuumdb error
Previous:From: Thom BrownDate: 2009-10-16 10:08:50
Subject: Re: vacuumdb error

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group