Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)

From: Mark Kirkwood <markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz>
To: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Lock Wait Statistics (next commitfest)
Date: 2009-08-01 01:14:16
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Mark Kirkwood wrote:
> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 17, 2009 at 3:38 AM, Mark
>> Kirkwood<markir(at)paradise(dot)net(dot)nz> wrote:
>>> With respect to the sum of wait times being not very granular, yes -
>>> quite
>>> true. I was thinking it is useful to be able to answer the question
>>> 'where
>>> is my wait time being spent' - but it hides cases like the one you
>>> mention.
>>> What would you like to see? would max and min wait times be a useful
>>> addition, or are you thinking along different lines?
>> track number of locks, sum of wait times, max(wait time).
>> but actually i started to think that the best is just make use of
>> log_lock_waits send the logs to csvlog and analyze there...
> Right - I'll look at adding max (at least) early next week.
Patch with max(wait time).

Still TODO

- amalgamate individual transaction lock waits
- redo (rather ugly) temporary pg_stat_lock_waits in a form more like

Attachment Content-Type Size
lockstats-3.patch.gz application/x-gzip 10.5 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message KaiGai Kohei 2009-08-01 03:44:46 Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2009-08-01 01:09:13 Re: SE-PostgreSQL Specifications