| From: | Andreas Wenk <a(dot)wenk(at)netzmeister-st-pauli(dot)de> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: psql \du and \dg is the same - pg 8.4 |
| Date: | 2009-07-21 20:12:46 |
| Message-ID: | 4A66213E.5030100@netzmeister-st-pauli.de |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane wrote:
> ANdreas Wenk <a(dot)wenk(at)netzmeister-st-pauli(dot)de> writes:
>> actually I discovered that using \du and \dg in psql is providing the
>> same result:
>
> Yup. The psql documentation says as much.
ok - got it ;-)
Should have read the psql docu ...
>> I am wondering why there is \dg at all.
>
> Users and groups used to be distinct kinds of objects. They aren't
> anymore, but people might still be used to the old commands.
Yeah I know - but I was wondering if it would make sense to have \dg
with a different result because here
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/role-membership.html
the people still read about group roles. I am not sure what is confusing
here - in psql or in the docu.
> regards, tom lane
Cheers
Andy
Cheers
Andy
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bernd Helmle | 2009-07-21 20:20:24 | Re: bytea vs. pg_dump |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2009-07-21 20:02:42 | Re: psql \du and \dg is the same - pg 8.4 |