Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Higher TOAST compression.

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Laurent Laborde" <kerdezixe(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Higher TOAST compression.
Date: 2009-07-17 17:50:51
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Laurent Laborde <kerdezixe(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote: 
> What about trying to change the TOAST_TUPLE_TARGET to get a higher
> compression (by having more toasted record) ?
> I'd like to change the TOAST_TUPLES_PER_PAGE. Maybe from 4 to 8 ?
> Is that correct ? Did i missed something ?
> I did some statistics and i will have much more TOASTed record as
> most of them are between 1KB and 2KB.
It seems like it might be reasonable to have a separate threshold for
compression from that for out-of-line storage.  Since I've been in
that code recently, I would be pretty comfortable doing something
about that; but, as is so often the case, the problem will probably be
getting agreement on what would be a good change.
Ignoring for a moment the fact that "low hanging fruit" in the form of
*very* large values can be handled first, the options would seem to
(1)  Just hard-code a lower default threshold for compression than for
out-of-line storage.
(2)  Add a GUC or two to control thresholds.
(3)  Allow override of the thresholds for individual columns.
Are any of these non-controversial?  What do people like there?  What
did I miss?

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Josh WilliamsDate: 2009-07-17 18:38:09
Subject: Review: Patch for contains/overlap of polygons
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-07-17 17:41:34
Subject: Re: Enhancement - code completion when typing set search_path

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group