Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Aidan Van Dyk <aidan(at)highrise(dot)ca>
Cc: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier
Date: 2009-06-30 13:07:33
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Aidan Van Dyk wrote:
> *especially* if those grants remain "by reference", i.e. If I change the
> GRANTS/REVOKES on sensitive_table, those are automatically "apply" to all
> tables created with the "WITH GRANTS LIKE sensitive_table"...

Isn't that exactly what Tom is objecting to, namely that the permissions 
of an object would not be contained entirely in catalog entry for the 
object itself?



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Merlin MoncureDate: 2009-06-30 13:11:39
Subject: Re: 8.5 development schedule
Previous:From: Aidan Van DykDate: 2009-06-30 13:02:27
Subject: Re: pre-proposal: permissions made easier

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group