Andrew Chernow wrote:
>> How about something like this? I switched to using LocalAlloc() in all
>> places to be consistent, instead of mixing heap and local. (Though per
>> doc, LocalAlloc is actually a wrapper for HeapAlloc in win32).
> Our patches crossed. Although, in my patch I left the allocation scheme
> alone since I wasn't sure if someone wanted that way. I'd suggest
> malloc and free if your going to change it. The only time I use an MS
> allocater is when a win32 api function specifically states it must be used.
Attached is a mix of our two patches. How does that look to you?
In response to
pgsql-bugs by date
|Next:||From: Andrew Chernow||Date: 2009-06-24 12:51:13|
|Subject: Re: BUG #4876: author of MD5 says it's seriously broken -
hash collision resistance problems|
|Previous:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-06-24 12:25:15|
|Subject: Re: psql: FATAL: the database system is in recovery mode|