Tom Lane wrote:
> Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com> writes:
>> Probably better if I break this up in logical chunks too. This patch
>> only addresses the refactoring you requested here:
> This looks sane to me in a quick once-over, though I've not tested it.
Thanks -- committed.
> A small suggestion for future patches: don't bother to reindent code
> chunks that aren't changing --- it just complicates the diff with a
> lot of uninteresting whitespace changes. You can either do that after
> review, or leave it to be done by pgindent. (Speaking of which, we
> need to schedule that soon...)
Sorry. "cvs diff -cb" seems to help (see attached). It is half the size
and much more readable.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Ron Mayer||Date: 2009-06-02 03:30:49|
|Subject: Re: explain analyze rows=%.0f|
|Previous:||From: Hiroshi Inoue||Date: 2009-06-02 03:22:13|
|Subject: Re: [GENERAL] trouble with to_char('L')|