Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>>> Why not? Right now it's single-threaded. Would it be faster if it ran
>>> several copies in parallel?
>> Sure, but that assumes you have parallel I/O channels; I assume right
>> now it is I/O limited.
> But so does parallel pg_restore, no?
Well, no, it assumes you're not saturating your I/O bandwidth, which
turns out to be the case more often than you might expect, even without
multiple I/O channels.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2009-05-29 01:26:35|
|Subject: Re: bytea vs. pg_dump|
|Previous:||From: Greg Smith||Date: 2009-05-29 01:23:28|
|Subject: Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type|