Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, James Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Python 3.0 does not work with PL/Python
Date: 2009-05-29 01:06:14
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> Bruce Momjian escribió:
>> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> On Monday 06 April 2009 02:10:59 James Pye wrote:
>>>> Any thoughts on the acceptability of a complete rewrite for Python 3?
>> You usually have to rewrite when you have not done refactoring as part
>> of development;  PGDG does refactoring regularly.
> Except that plpython stagnates, save for minor hacks here and there.

Does Python 3 have some sort of usable sandbox that would mean we could 
have a trusted plpython?

Otherwise, I'm not too keen simply to throw Python 2.x overboard until 
it's no longer common on platforms people are likely to want to install 
Postgres on, if that's what's implied by the original question.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-05-29 01:08:23
Subject: Re: User-facing aspects of serializable transactions
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2009-05-29 01:03:21
Subject: Re: pg_migrator and an 8.3-compatible tsvector data type

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group