Re: increase index performance

From: Thomas Finneid <tfinneid(at)fcon(dot)no>
To: Matthew Wakeling <matthew(at)flymine(dot)org>
Cc: Greg Smith <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: increase index performance
Date: 2009-05-13 19:45:28
Message-ID: 4A0B2358.4020006@fcon.no
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Matthew Wakeling wrote:
> Thomas, the order of columns in the index matters. The index is
> basically a tree structure, which resolves the left-most column before
> resolving the column to the right of it. So to answer your query, it
> will resolve the city_id, then it will have to scan almost all of the
> tree under that, because you are not constraining for street_id. A much
> better index to answer your query is (city_id, house_id, floor_id) -
> then it can just look up straight away. Instead of the index returning
> 200000 rows to check, it will return just the 2000.

Thats something I was a bit unsure about, because of the cardinality of
the data. But thanks, I will try it. Just need to populate a new data
base with the new index. (Apparently, creating a new index on an already
existing database is slower than just recreating the db, when the db is
250GB big)

thomas

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Dimitri Fontaine 2009-05-13 21:23:15 Re: Any better plan for this query?..
Previous Message Scott Carey 2009-05-13 18:59:00 Re: AMD Shanghai versus Intel Nehalem