Re: idea: global temp tables

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: "Pavel Stehule" <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: idea: global temp tables
Date: 2009-04-27 21:27:36
Message-ID: 49F5DCF8.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> wrote:

> Or perhaps Pavel doesn't really mean "global" as the term is used
> in Postgres (c.f. the pg_database table)?

I'd bet that he doesn't. He's taking terminology from the standard,
where it means "not limited to one SQL-client module". It just means
it is available as long as you are using the connection.

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message A.M. 2009-04-27 21:32:50 Re: idea: global temp tables
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-04-27 21:22:14 Re: idea: global temp tables