Re: BUG #4780: Aggregate functions are unaware of LIMIT clauses in SELECTs

From: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>
To: "Ted Holzman" <tholzman(at)fhcrc(dot)org>,<pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: BUG #4780: Aggregate functions are unaware of LIMIT clauses in SELECTs
Date: 2009-04-24 16:35:22
Message-ID: 49F1A3FA.EE98.0025.0@wicourts.gov
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"Ted Holzman" <tholzman(at)fhcrc(dot)org> wrote:

> AGGREGATE functions don't appear to respond to LIMIT clauses.

Not a bug. LIMIT affects how many rows are in the result set the
LIMIT qualifies.

> select sum(generate_series)
> from generate_series(1,10) limit 3;
> sum
> -----
> 55
> (1 row)
>
> I was expecting the sum to be 6.

The LIMIT is applied to the final result set, which is only one row,
so the LIMIT has nothing to do. If you wanted to limit how many rows
went into the aggregate function, you'd need to do something like
this:

select sum(generate_series)
from (select generate_series(1,10) limit 3) x;
sum
-----
6
(1 row)

-Kevin

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Grace 2009-04-25 00:03:54 Query with aggregate over subselects fails with ERROR: plan should not reference subplan's variable
Previous Message Ted Holzman 2009-04-24 16:07:26 BUG #4780: Aggregate functions are unaware of LIMIT clauses in SELECTs