Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Postgres on filer via NFS

From: Brian Ghidinelli <brian(at)pukkasoft(dot)com>
To: SF Postgres <sfpug(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Postgres on filer via NFS
Date: 2009-03-25 15:13:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: sfpug
David Fetter wrote:
> DON'T!  Just get a flock of small-radius SAS drives and arrange them
> as a RAID-10 :)

Thanks for the feedback.  Jeff Frost once painfully proved to me how
fast the new drives and DAS can be.  There are obviously some advantages
to a filer (NetApp in this case) like the cloning, management and
sharing it among boxes.

> Absolutely.  Nothing about network-attached storage has changed in
> general, and the article leaves out the fact that most people's

So basically you need a sane NFS config and it's OK then?  We can do FCP
on this NetApp so speed I don't think will be an issue.  Plus our
database will fit into RAM so management/availability "features" is as
important as speed.  I know Hi5 is all NetApp so apparently it *does*
work.  I just wondered if they had magic genies. :)


Adi, I saw this thread previously; the diverging opinions out there are 
what prompted my question.  Thanks for the input!


In response to


sfpug by date

Next:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2009-03-25 18:18:56
Subject: Re: Postgres on filer via NFS
Previous:From: Miho IshikuraDate: 2009-03-25 00:28:35
Subject: Re: Resources for Postgres and MySQL comparison presentation?

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group