Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 50 line queries (new flyer)

From: Peter Headland <Peter(at)matrixlink(dot)com>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: 50 line queries (new flyer)
Date: 2009-03-03 23:32:56
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy
Josh Berkus wrote:
> Peter Headland wrote:
>>   Excuse my ignorance - I didn't understand the reference to 50-line 
>> queries in the original version of the new flyer. I assume that 
>> no-one thinks 50 lines of text is indicative of an especially complex 
>> query, so what did that mean?
> Just *try* to run a 50-line query (with multiple subselects, etc.) on 
> MySQL or SQLite.

Ah. I'm used to seeing queries with several hundred (long, dense, and 
unreadable) lines that run just fine on Oracle, so the "50 lines" thing 
made me wonder "if they think that's complex, maybe they can't handle 
the really heavy stuff" - IOW, the opposite of what was intended. 
Fortunately, that part is not in the final version of the document, so 
it's moot.

I guess it's tricky to write a single document that hits all the right 
notes with both the Oracle and MySQL crowds...

Peter Headland

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Douglas J HunleyDate: 2009-03-04 02:38:39
Subject: pgsql announce now on twitter
Previous:From: Josh BerkusDate: 2009-03-02 19:35:23
Subject: Re: 50 line queries (new flyer)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group