Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: xpath processing brain dead

From: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: xpath processing brain dead
Date: 2009-02-28 03:55:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Hannu Krosing wrote:
>> Some of the functions, including some specified in the standard, produce 
>> fragments. That's why we have the 'IS DOCUMENT' test.
> But then you could use xmlfragments as the functions return type, no ?

Not in the case of xpath, no.

There is a very complete standard for the Xpath data model, and we need 
to adhere to it.



In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-02-28 04:06:11
Subject: Re: add_path optimization
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-02-28 03:38:48
Subject: Re: add_path optimization

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group