Tom Lane wrote:
> Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
>> Tom Lane wrote:
>>> I'm okay with removing this for 8.4, but I think it's too late to
>>> change the behavior of 8.3.
>> It's never too late to fix a bug.
> When the proposed fix involves breaking cases that used to behave
> usefully, you need a much stronger argument than that.
What I have proposed for 8.3 should not break a single case that
currently behaves usefully. If anyone has a counter-example please show it.
What I have proposed for 8.4 possibly would break current "useful"
behaviour (FSVO "useful"), but should be done anyway on correctness grounds.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Heikki Linnakangas||Date: 2009-02-26 18:38:33|
|Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery infra|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-02-26 18:17:18|
|Subject: Re: xpath processing brain dead |