Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Guy Rouillier <guyr-ml1(at)burntmail(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-02-04 17:37:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
Karsten Hilbert wrote:
>>> Craig, what kind of "events" are you thinking about?  Triggers are 
>>> already pieces of code that run upon "certain events", namely insert, 
>>> update or delete events.  What others do you have in mind?
>> That's a good point, actually. I can't think of much you can't do with a 
>> trigger (SECURITY DEFINER if necessary) on a table. Not thinking straight.
> I would find ON CONNECT/DISCONNECT triggers very useful. Probably
> this is more similar to database-wide assertions.

But a job scheduler would not help with that.  Perhaps you intended your 
comment to fall into the "pet peeves" bucket rather than the "job 
scheduler" bucket.

Guy Rouillier

In response to


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: John DeSoiDate: 2009-02-04 17:39:42
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Previous:From: Iñigo BarandiaranDate: 2009-02-04 16:46:05
Subject: Re: field with Password

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group