Re: Pet Peeves?

From: Richard Huxton <dev(at)archonet(dot)com>
To: Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Pet Peeves?
Date: 2009-02-04 08:49:28
Message-ID: 49895698.5040905@archonet.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Gregory Stark wrote:
> Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> writes:
>
>>>> 3. Date handling
>>>> Sometimes I've got data with invalid dates and it would be great if it
>>>> could replace all the bad ones with, say "0000-00-00".
>>>>
>> Oh dear $DEITY, no.
>
> I think it would be best if we limited ourselves right now to discussing the
> problems themselves and not debating the pros and cons of possible solutions.

It seems I need to point out that the 0000-00-00 thing was supposed to
be a joke.

--
Richard Huxton
Archonet Ltd

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kusuma Pabba 2009-02-04 09:09:26 installation
Previous Message Karsten Hilbert 2009-02-04 08:39:49 Re: Pet Peeves?