Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Joshua Brindle <method(at)manicmethod(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, PG Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
Date: 2009-01-30 22:02:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian wrote:
> Josh Berkus wrote:
>>> Yea, it would take some work but it is an idea.
>> It's *an* idea,yes.  But it introduces as many (or more) problems than 
>> it solves.
> Ah, but my problems might be easier solved than the row-level permission
> problems.  ;-)

Or might not.  Multi-partition indexes?  Multi-partition uniqueness? 
Automated moving of rows between partitions?


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-01-30 22:19:16
Subject: Re: How to get SE-PostgreSQL acceptable
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2009-01-30 21:52:38
Subject: Re: PQinitSSL broken in some use casesf

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group