Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning)

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning)
Date: 2009-01-29 18:36:21
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> Someone submits patch
>  ticket is created
>  reviewer takes ticket
>  comments
> submitter takes ticket
>  fixes based on comments
> review takes ticket
>  approves
> if reviewer is a committers, he commits.
> if reviewer isn't he set the ticket to "need final review"
> tickets that are in that state are reviewed by commiters.
> Sounds like standard stuff to me.

But that's *not* actually how we do things.  So you're making my point.


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Sushant SinhaDate: 2009-01-29 18:54:12
Subject: Re: possible bug in cover density ranking?
Previous:From: Heikki LinnakangasDate: 2009-01-29 18:35:12
Subject: Re: Hot standby, recovery infra

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group