| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Marko Kreen <markokr(at)gmail(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Commitfest infrastructure (was Re: 8.4 release planning) |
| Date: | 2009-01-29 18:36:21 |
| Message-ID: | 4981F725.1060109@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Josh,
> Someone submits patch
> ticket is created
> reviewer takes ticket
> comments
> submitter takes ticket
> fixes based on comments
> review takes ticket
> approves
> if reviewer is a committers, he commits.
> if reviewer isn't he set the ticket to "need final review"
> tickets that are in that state are reviewed by commiters.
>
> Sounds like standard stuff to me.
But that's *not* actually how we do things. So you're making my point.
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sushant Sinha | 2009-01-29 18:54:12 | Re: possible bug in cover density ranking? |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2009-01-29 18:35:12 | Re: Hot standby, recovery infra |