| From: | Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Gregory Stark <stark(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pet Peeves? |
| Date: | 2009-01-29 18:18:49 |
| Message-ID: | 4981F309.2090909@pinpointresearch.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Gregory Stark wrote:
> Steve Crawford <scrawford(at)pinpointresearch(dot)com> writes:
>
>
>>>> 3. Date handling
>>>> Sometimes I've got data with invalid dates and it would be great if it
>>>> could replace all the bad ones with, say "0000-00-00".
>>>>
>>>>
>> Oh dear $DEITY, no.
>>
>
> I think it would be best if we limited ourselves right now to discussing the
> problems themselves and not debating the pros and cons of possible solutions.
>
> I want to encourage people to post their peeves even if they know perfectly
> well the reasons why things are the way they are.
>
>
Fair enough.
My big pg_dump peeve: the inability to dump a function-definition with
pg_dump.
Cheers,
Steve
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Steve Atkins | 2009-01-29 18:22:16 | Re: Pet Peeves? |
| Previous Message | Bill Moran | 2009-01-29 18:16:19 | Re: Pet Peeves? |