Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: 8.4 release planning

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning
Date: 2009-01-27 05:36:55
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers

> The reviewing that happened during this CommitFest did not happen on
> the basis of who was interested in which patches.  There was a bit of
> that, but for the most part people reviewed the patches that they were
> asked to review.  I assumed (am I the only one?) that the REASON why
> we were not asked to review SE-PostgreSQL or Hot Standby is because
> the committers were planning to do that themselves due to the
> complexity of the patches.

Actually, I did assign someone to do a build and specification review. 
But yes, I expected that the code review would *have* to be done by a 
long-term committer.  I pretty much assume that of anything over 300 lines.

The idea behind having new reviewers take on all the small patches, was, 
of course, to give the main committers more time with patches like 
SEPostgres.  It worked with other stuff (like Windowing and CTE).


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-01-27 05:38:17
Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2009-01-27 05:25:56
Subject: Re: SE-PostgreSQL Updated Revision (r1460)

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group