> having said that, i don't think that inventing new syntax is the way
> to go... a reloption seems better (thinking a little more, it could be
> a problem if the user changes the reloptions of an already created
There's also the issue with backup/restore: we need some kind of syntax
for restoring a read-only view which doesn't depend on command ordering.
So we need a ALTER VIEW SET READ ONLY or similar.
Overall, I'm starting to think there's a lot of syntax and issues that
need to be worked out, and I'm thinking it's too late in the cycle to do
that for 8.4.
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2009-01-27 04:05:13|
|Subject: Re: Meridiem markers (was: [BUGS] Incorrect "invalid AM/PM string" error from to_timestamp) |
|Previous:||From: Bruce Momjian||Date: 2009-01-27 04:02:33|
|Subject: Re: 8.4 release planning|
pgsql-committers by date
|Next:||From: Bernd Helmle||Date: 2009-01-27 10:31:26|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd
|Previous:||From: Jaime Casanova||Date: 2009-01-27 03:39:48|
|Subject: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle|