| From: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Bernd Helmle <mailings(at)oopsware(dot)de>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
| Date: | 2009-01-27 01:47:24 |
| Message-ID: | 497E67AC.6000107@agliodbs.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce,
>> yes. we detect that and send a warning saying that there not be any rules
>
> OK, so we are going to need an option to suppress that warning, even
> without the problems of upgrades and customization.
Per my response earlier, I think we really logically need an error if
the user specifies UPDATABLE.
--Josh
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jaime Casanova | 2009-01-27 03:39:48 | Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Automatic view update rules Bernd Helmle |
| Previous Message | User Itagaki | 2009-01-27 01:35:54 | reorg - pg_reorg: workaround with 8.2. |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-01-27 02:02:32 | Re: 8.4 release planning |
| Previous Message | Joshua Brindle | 2009-01-27 01:45:38 | Re: 8.4 release planning |