Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PGCon brand

From: Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Selena Deckelmann <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>, melanie(at)dunslane(dot)net
Subject: Re: PGCon brand
Date: 2009-01-12 19:10:40
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

> I agree, though I've always wondered if a better solution would be for Dan to 
> rename his conference as PGCan (which is a play on BSDCan, his other 
> conference, and would provide even more brand identity). 

Well, right now, pgCon is the primary conference for PostgreSQL hackers. 
  Renaming it to pgCan would be tantamount to giving up that status. 
That's not an issue with BSDCan because there's no significant BSD US 


In response to


pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2009-01-12 20:12:03
Subject: PgUS 2008 end of year summary
Previous:From: Robert TreatDate: 2009-01-12 17:44:06
Subject: Re: PGCon brand

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group